Tuesday, June 10, 2014

NATION BUIDING AND DEFENCE FORCES

As of date Indian defence Forces are over a million plus serving and large number of retirees between the age of forty and above. Over a period of time the forces have built massive infrastructure in terms of facilities. Some of these are legacy of the colonial times and an undeveloped market. However like a good house wife it refuses to shed the colonial past and fully grabbing the future. This mindset is in its thought, traditions and culture. Staying aloof was a colonial requirement but not of free democratic nation.
Such a huge trained manpower is available for any contingency that may arise on our borders. With major wars being uncommon- last war was fought in 71 and there is no likelihood for any thing in the foreseeable future. Pakistan, one of the major irritant can not fight a conventional war and hope for a modicum of success. Therefore it will continue the proxy war. China, the other neighbour has established such a massive edge in-terms of conventional/nuclear capability that India can not win either of the wars. Deterrence is the aim and that should be doable.
Disaster management and CI/LWE has been given to central/state police forces and border management less Line of Control with Pakistan and some portion with China too has been given to force other than the army.
The CRPF/ITBP have raised forces for all the additional tasks of disaster and border management therefore corresponding decrease should have been done by the army, which apparently has not happened. Rashtriya Rifles raised for CI in J&K need to be reviewed.
With the reduced responsibility why should the defence forces not get involved in Nation Building?

What can be done without compromising the war preparedness
Component of the defence forces deployed in peace stations train for three months and three months go towards leave. Remainder time is available for activities of nation building.
To ensure that the nation is not caught off guard, the slack/spare time would need to be harmonised with likely operational season which depends on various factors well known to military.
Specific Activities

Talent hunt and train youth in sports
Make available sports infra to selected promising youth.
Skill building- army can facilitate building skills at par or superior to ITIs. Training cooks; mechanics; drivers; electricians; English speaking; computer learning and host of other vocational skills from its existing/augmented facilities.
Awareness of hygiene/sanitation; introducing solar; non conventional energy in remote areas
Training village youth in E monitoring of government schemes and other e-learning options.
Defence forces have a system of adopting villages in difficult areas in J&k and NE to aid those areas where reach of government is weak. This can be extended to areas in the mainland and help catch up on the last time thereby ensuring inclusive growth.
Defence forces can contribute in higher learning by opening more institutes of excellence in conjunction with HRD ministry.

Self Evolution
In the history of warfare the leader with best application of mind has been Krishna. His capability to influence the outcome by proper manoeuvring is well known. His name is “Ranchhor”- run away from battle are great traditions which unfortunately we do not follow. Its the Israeli army which believes in survive to fight another day rather than the colonial way of last man last round. Chankya too needs to be understood and incorporated in military thought.
Facilitate R&D in military fields. Web and hosts of others were developed by US for military use. There are many bright minds – MSc from IITs and some from foreign countries. These minds must facilitate research and design formulation in conjunction with other brains working in DRDOs/IITs/Pvt sect R&D.

Conclusion

Army has a bitter experience of pre 62 war when it got involved in residential accommodation building at the cost of operational preparedness. That must not come in the way of seeing afresh the need of the nation to develop and defence being big consumer of budget has a moral obligation to, pitch in towards this onerous task.



No comments: