Wednesday, November 30, 2016

FIDAYEEN ON ARMY POSTS: CHANGE OF STRATEGY

Nagrota, Uri, Pathankot heavily protected defence establishment with intelligence inputs attacked by fidayeen leading to very heavy loss of life to trained military manpower. Very frustrating and shows defence forces in poor light to civilian and veteran-- getting mauled even when armed.
Fidayeen comes with fixed aim. Die whilst executing assigned mission causing maximum collateral damage both physical but more important psychological. If reports are to be believed, detailed intelligence about layout available with terrorists undoubtedly indicates someone from inside facilitating entry from vulnerable point; exploiting weaknesses of existing procedures (coming in army combat dress during early morning, thereby defeating orders to open fire only after positive identification. Early morning; foggy conditions force on soldier to wait for identifying before opening fire, which in some cases is too late. Excessive defensive orders have forced fear of non acceptance of causalities by default. By exploiting existing operational conditions, terrorist appears to be succeeding in both. Advantage Pak army.
Fatigue come complacency having set in over a period of time due repeated intelligence in puts is one of the major reasons for lethargic reactions.Non availability of bullet proof jackets; night vision devices and fear of own causalities could be a reason for local commanders to minimise venturing out, leading to defensive mindset.  Disadvantage Indian Army
Fidayeen has forced defensive mindset amongst soldiers and anyone who defends is likely to lose more often and that’s exactly what’s happening. Advantage Pak army and terrorists
Nation has become so less sensitive to deaths- cash rewards; revenge and martyrdom with presence of ceremonial funeral; VIPs; Media during funeral. Thereafter its life as usual carries on. Army goes for massive artillery assaults leading to deaths/injuries across. Kill and counter kills.Pakistan looses terrorist and India looses trained manpower. Terrorists are mankind haters with little mercy but perceive fighting religious war so highly motivated. ZERO sum game.
Options for way ahead
Existing Bases
            Existing bases lack physical/electronic and security thus making them vulnerable to terror attack. Electronic surveillance; boundary walls do add to physical security but give the soldier a defensive mindset. Be aggressive with tiered ambushes beyond perimeter with changing locations. Investing in local intelligence by keeping watch on doubtful integrity characters with police help will go a long way. Working out better surveillance on service providers      
Shift from defensive to offensive defence at vulnerable bases. Provision of bullet proof jackets, night vision devices would be pre requisite. Modification of existing operating procedures regarding opening fire may be undertaken. Opening fire on positive identification becomes extremely difficult during poor visibility and gets aggravated when terrorist adorn our uniforms. This will ensure lesser casualty and terrorists being defeated beyond perimeter. Very interesting pattern of mosques/shrines within military stations/cantonment exist close to such areas where watch can be kept and intelligence gathered in very innocent manner. Areas around basis are populated by people with suspect loyalties. Unfortunately porters; shopkeepers and other service providers move freely within cants. Collection of information/inciting vulnerable through lure of money/other favours is very easily doable. Frisking of populace around and strict vigil on so called relatives and those moving within campus with comparative ease needs to be checked.
                Electronic surveillance; boundary walls do add to physical security but give the soldier a defensive mindset. Be aggressive with tiered ambushes beyond perimeter with changing locations. Investing in local intelligence by keeping watch on doubtful integrity characters with police help will go a long way. Working out better surveillance on service providers

                Rather than wait for terrorist to attack, need to seek and destroy him by venturing out to areas in the near vicinity simultaneously enhancing local intelligence through own/police resources. Become HUNTERS rather than HUNTED
Zero sum game
Carry on with zero sum game. India looses in long run though Pak too suffer but Pak looses comparatively moderate to Indian very heavy. It’s basically status quo but unimaginative way of fighting an action. Must be discarded state away.
Border Surveillance
                Strengthen border security with all weather electronic surveillance. Terrain on border will enable few terrorists to cross over with Pak army providing fire support to divert attention. But could enhance bids foiled at border itself. Strict punishment against complacency and procedural modifications to have offensive content in guarding bases procedures. Move out of perimeter with multiple; location/pattern ambushes whilst enhancing local intelligence.
Snipers
                Sniper shooters on borders to target command and control elements and permitting no move once infiltration takes place through post to deter enemy post from undertaking this activity.  Good deterrent will help to some extent.
Covert Action
                Covert action through own borders or Baluchistan ups the ante somewhat but has significant potential of diversion of assets.  Both doable but implies upping the ante. Prisoners under death sentence would not mind undertaking this task. Come back post mission accomplishment and free to live. Extension of covert operations a win win situation but with its own risks and ramifications. Sleeper cells in Pak hinterland capable of retaliating on orders. Large number of border area people has relatives across who interact frequently and would be amenable to undertake intelligence and low quality missions and provides support to high quality missions. Liquidating terror heads based in Muzzafarabad easily doable in two night foot based operations.
Conclusion
Present modus operandi being followed by Indian army is proving to be ineffective, in fact disastrous. Giving massive advantage to Pakistan/terrorist must be discarded urgently. Modify existing procedures enabling intruder management in adverse weather by replacing on opening fire only after positive identification.
All service providers having access to unit campuses & locals in immediate vicinity must be kept under surveillance with police help.
Strengthen bases with physical/electronic capability and provide adequate wherewithal for night offensive posturing. Shift from HUNTED to HUNTER.
Border/LC rather than massive fir assaults go for sniper to kill selected command and control elements. Enhance electronic surveillance reinforcing with sub terrain sensors. Tunnels being new modus operandi, this threat needs to be countered adequately.
Covert operations up to Muzzafarabad, capital of POK or on western border via Baluchistan