Wednesday, February 24, 2016

WAR IN KASHMIR VALLEY: CHANGE OF STRATEGY

Indian Army has been losing very high number of young officers in the undeclared/proxy war in Kashmir Valley. Matter of deep concern as the bargain is killing a few terrorists at the cost of young officers. It’s a very poor bargain indeed.
During British rule of India, army followed a dictum called “last man last round”, came to be known as “not an inch of territory to be lost”. This implied army troops deployed on a piece of ground are not to retreat and die if attacked and even if odds are heavily stacked against the force. Similarly for piece of ground to be held and defended against an assaulting enemy, it needs tactical considerations and not emotional logic.
Over a period of time, armies realising that it costs heavy to train officers and men have been modifying this dictum. Israel, surrounded by maximum enemies was the first one to review and wisely so. It was changed to live another day to fight back rather than get slaughtered in hopeless situation. No wonder, it suffers least causalities in spite of very heavy violence almost on daily basis.
Fishermen fishing in our waters around Andaman and Nicobar Islands don’t mind being arrested by our security forces as they are assured of decent treatment in jails till courts pronounce judgement which is very liberal. Anyone caught by others is not arrested but knuckle cracking and sending off is the treatment. Rightly these people dread others but don’t mind stealing our fish.
Are we soft/too humane are shear incompetent to implement law with the severity it demands or nation doesn’t care for the economic costs being forced upon or is the Government of the day scared of harsh measures due to vocal but incompetent media catering more for TRPs rather than truthful reporting. Probably all combined make us a soft state incapable of tough decisions.
Keeping in view the worsening security situation which would become worse with militant Islam raising its ugly head on our borders, it’s time for review. Situation becomes worse when locals start to side the terrorists when cornered by security forces and start to act as human shields and on collateral damage taking place, every one without accountability, wants his 5 seconds of fame by quoting numerous laws and rights though it’s not applicable when terrorists undertake terror acts killing unarmed civilians. Civilians providing human shields emboldens other waiting on the other side and gives adequate munitions to all divisive forces within and foreign.
When terrorists are surrounded, hiding and firing-why should they be attacked? Wear them out and use maximum force after evicting civilians being used as hostages. Some refuse to come out use appropriate force. This will instill fear amongst terrorist and their supporters
Keeping the above in view, it may be desirable to review basic tactics with following guidelines
                Own/civilian causalities are avoided.
                Time be used as force multiplier to own advantage- wear out/no hurry
                Use technology rather than physical force
Let NGOs/political leaders (those who chest beat post an encounter) go in and motivate terrorists to surrender. Also involve local Maulavi/village seniors to negotiate
Use fire; smoke and stun grenades to kill/evict holed up terrorists
Media be kept away during conduct and video be released during operational press conference
This approach will be a win – win for security forces and the nation, only looser will be terrorists and Pak, Isn’t that all we wish