INDIAN DEFENCE FORCE AND POLITISISATION

Indian defence forces were organised from local kings forces to organised national force by British during its rule over India. Indian defence force apart from securing hostile frontiers with Afghanistan were also used for conquering kings who were unwillingly to join British government in India. Since defence forces were required to fight & kill Indian citizens , fighting on the other side presented a loyalty dilemma. Thus British officers commanding Indian forces, Cantonments away from civilians & almost complete infrastructure to sustain and ensure quality life with out mixing up with common citizens was put in place.

Freedom fighters, other leaders fighting for independence had significant potential of influencing mind of soldiers which could lead to insubordination/mutiny against British against Indian citizens. Defence forces came under Governor General, who exercised all power with some sort of power delegated to natives. APOLITICAL army ensured a virtual wall between British, the rulers and Indians, the ruled. Suited British and they ensured by giving special status to defence personnel. Thus keeping forces away from politics was crucial for survival of British rule in India.

ICS, Police & other central services ensuring tax collections & furthering British rule were treated with special incentives. Degradadtion of Indian heritage, dividing society on various lines & introduction of English language ensured divide between Native & British & their tools for governance always existed giving inferiority complex to natives. And it worked wonderfully well for over a century.

In 47 when India became independent, every tool of governance, changed to be in harmony with new masters, elected representatives, change attitude to civilians. Infact from Master-slaves equation,it changed to US & OURS. For some reasons defence forces refused to fall in line and continued with British system of things- privileged status but soon it became an eye sore People started to question it and some thought of coup aka Pakistan by defence forces. Apolitical army and fear of coup scared the politicians. It continued with President as Supreme Commander, equivalent of British Governor General but minus power, which was with Prime Minister. Thus babus and politicians started to degrade defence forces by keeping them away from decision making and controlling all financial powers. Defence being super specialised profession and minister knowing little babus took power into their hands by conniving with political leadership. Defence forces kept going down whilst other organs kept going up in all parameters incl pay, perks, status etc.

Presently forces are being strangulated by babus, knowing nothing with zero accountability but exercising all powers on the name of democracy. This has harmed the services tremendously. Infact popular saying goes, Indian Defence Forces biggest enemy is our Ministry Of Defence.

Numerous studies/recommendation to bring in professionalism in MOD have been blocked by MOD fearing accountability & Minsters have accepted this nonsensical logic.

The question what Defence forces need to ask is why aren’t we part of political system of India? Why we have no say in policy matters? If other services are efficient, loyal why can’t we be loyal why becoming political?

Being political implies,

We vote to political parties, which we are doing even today.

We must interact with politicians of all parties. This is not being done. But as responsible citizens, a soldier must be aware of various lines of thought prevailing in the country.

PM & not President must be Supreme Commander as all power & resource are vested with GOI headed by PM. President being only a ceremonial head.

Every Indian votes and so do soldiers. How does a soldier make an intelligent choice if he is isolated from rest of society?

Time for defence forces to initiate discussion to reform itself from apolitical to political army. Babus, who are exercising powers on behalf of ministers with out accountability will loose.

Its WIN WIN for India, & Indian defence forces. There is bound to be initial resistance due emotional reasons but logical approach and changing ties demand Politicisation being need of the hour.

AFGHANISTAN: POST US DEPARTURE, WAY AHEAD

US leaving Afghanistan is a matter of time. Though its being claimed as some victory but the fact is US is abandoning Afghanistan out of frustration, as nothing has unfolded as per its plans.

Pakistan sees this as a big victory, as it hopes it would be able to install Pak based Taliban to rule Afghanistan after US exit. Its set back for weak democratic government in Af as well as India which has invested huge resources in developing its soft power and providing training to military and police forces.

Afghanistan has been ruled by weak centre through strong tribal lords exercising influence on their tribes. War/tribal lords are ferociously independent but loyalty can be purchased with adequate compensation in cash or kind. People are hardy and not inclined to follow strict discipline. Religious but tolerant unlike Taliban which believes in Sharia. It has weak institutions with writ running over restricted areas with little authority to enforce its directions. Democracy, women empowerment etc are not very popular being western concepts.

Drugs have of late become major source of earnings, otherwise agriculture and allied activities, keep people employed.

On the western front, Russia,CAR and Iran do wield influence and would not like hostile regime in Kabul to support tribals with cross border loyalties. Thus would retain degree of influence through tribal war lords and exercise control over areas close to borders.

on the eastern side Pak has strained relations with tribals and Afghanistan. Border between two nations is loosely demarcated, underdeveloped with extremely rugged terrain. Baluchistan and other tribes are not too happy and would like to cede away from Pak and ethnic affinity is close to Afghans than Pak. Pak has also been exploiting this area without any development.

China would like to fill the void created by US withdrawal but Muslims distrust Chinese due to their harassment of Uighurs in Xingjiang province. China has the financial might to influence or control Afghanistan through loose federation of tribal war lords but Taliban will Not accept any Chinese role. Dilemma for both Pak and China.

India has a challenging period ahead. Everyone less democratic government and masses are not happy with Indian influence amongst masses. Soft power wise India is numero uno. But many feel India in an uninvited guest and must exit letting Pak to manage Afghanistan.

US, Afghan government desire India deploy its military forces in Afghanistan. For obvious reasons India is disinclined. Also moment US departs, first to fall would central democratically elected government at Kabul. And it really would make no difference since it has limited influence beyond Kabul.

After US departs with or without an agreement, uncertainty that follows will lead to huge bloodshed, refugees exodus and collapse of whatever governance is there Taliban will come back and try to establish its writ through tribal war lords by promising power and money. Chaos would prevail for considerable amount of time. China, India, CAR,Russia, Iran and India would like to follow wait and watch policy whilst Pak will try to establish a regime loyal to it with China quietly directing things from behind the scenes to ensure favourable regime.

Other scenario is China takes the lead incorporating all Afghanistan’s neighbours and try to hammer out way ahead to ensure peace in Afghanistan and all share holders security and financial concerns are addressed. China would pump in huge resources for road and allied infrastructure development enabling connectivity and access to all for trade and other activities.

Islamic forces led by Saudi Arabia or Iran, is an option, but existing animosity amongst these nations and strained US -Iran relations rule out this, otherwise a workable option.

Finally UN sponsored process comprising forces of neighbouring countries and China/India could stabilise Afghanistan without undue bloodshed. Treaty brokered primarily by US, Russia and UN amongst Afghanistan government, other influential tribal leaders and Taliban leadership.

India should encourage US to go far UN facilitated stabilisation and agreement implementation programme with security and financial during transition clearly defined. UN has adequate expertise in managing multi lateral forces with reasonable level of efficiency.

India must be more proactive as PM Modi has reasonable trust of all stake holders less Pakistan, that can be better managed through China. Its most workable and Indian long term interests adequately safeguarded.